There are eighteen members in the subcommittee that were appointed by city council. Gustavo Reveles is the BOAC liaison bringing the total membership to nineteen. Jaime Esparza was elected the chairman of the subcommittee. Nestor Valencia was elected vice-chair. The other members are: Rafael Adame, Jesus “Cimi” Alvarado, Ruben Chavez, Yolanda Clay, Luis Cortinas, Fermin Dorado, Rosa Guerrero, Hector Gutierrez, Gov. Carlos Hisa, Enrique Moreno, Barbara Perez, Cindy Ramos-Davidson, Silvestre Reyes, Belen Robles, Mayor Maya Sanchez and Theresa Ware-Asbury.
The ordinance establishing the subcommittee tasked the committee with eight tasks to undertake. They are:
1. The size of the cultural center
2. The appropriate budget for the construction
3. The resources for enhancing the budget for the cultural center
4. Suggested facilities programing and amenities
5. The types of services
6. Recommendations for funding opportunities
7. Recommendations for public/private partnerships
8. Means for fundraising for the cultural center
As you can see, the location and naming of the cultural center is not included in the tasks assigned to the subcommittee. During city council discussion about a possible location, city attorney Silvia Forth Borunda reminded city council that the location for the cultural center was to be in District 8 as per the Quality of Life Bonds ordinances. When the discussion started to delve into specific locations, Tommy Gonzalez reminded city council that discussions about specific locations should be held in executive session to avoid the possibility of pricing going up for any realty purchases for the center.
City council retired into executive session for a few minutes to discuss the location issue after Gonzalez was asked by Lily Limon if the city was actively engaged in looking for locations. Council went into executive session to discuss the status of locations for the cultural center and the children’s museum. No public comment was made after city council returned from executive session about possible locations.
The city attorney agreed to bring back to city council an amendment to the ordinance establishing the subcommittee to add the additional tasks of deliberating and proposing a name for the cultural center and a “general” location for it.
Esparza also reported that three groups comprised of subcommittee members to address the specific tasks assigned to the subcommittee. Group 1 is the “Facility size and programming” group. It is focusing on items one, four and five as per the tasks listed above. Group 2 is the “Budget” group. It is focusing on items two and three. The final group, number three is the “Fundraising” group. This group is focusing on six, seven and eight. Esparza reported that all of the groups have already met. Jaime Esparza added that Mexican-American Cultural Institute (MACI) has been actively involved in the process.
Emma Acosta asked for more information about MACI. She stated that she has been approached by members of the community that have been asking for more information about the group. Acosta stated that she “was not approached” to join the group. Esparza responded that MACI is an “informal group” and does not have formal membership requirements. He added, “all are welcome” to the MACI meetings.
Acosta reiterated that she wants Esparza to inform her of the MACI meetings. She stated, “three of us have never been invited to attend” apparently referring to the Hispanic members of city council.
The subcommittee is currently surveying local artists and cultural practitioners for comments about the cultural center. The findings are expected by May 20.
Although some in the news media continues to label the cultural center as the “Hispanic” cultural center, the fact is that it has not been officially designated as such. Some members of the community continue to argue that it should be named the “heritage” center. The city attorney is expected to bring back an amendment to the ordinance for the subcommittee adding the task of suggesting a name for city council action.