First, though, this latest incident gives me an opportunity to demonstrate to you how my blog allows me to build a dataset of incidents that I can use to document the corruption over a long period of time. I have dubbed this as “connecting the dots”. The problem is that the corruptors are adept at hiding information. Little pieces emerge here and there but the body of evidence is controlled and manipulated by the corruptors. The latest incident involving Ann Morgan Lilly is one of three incidents that I have documented since in 2013.
Without my blog, many of you would not know about the three incidents of assault that have been alleged against Ann Morgan Lilly, and her husband, “Rut”. The context of the supporting incidents would have been lost. The preponderance of evidence is clear as to whom is likely telling the truth, the Leeser’s not the Lilly’s.
For many years now I have been documenting the corruption of El Paso. Among the theories that I have been developing is the notion that there exists a “protected class” in El Paso. A class of people who are immune to being held accountable for their actions. It is my contention that the Lilly’s are part of the protected class.
I first brought up the “protected class” in 2012 and many of you thought I was crazy.
So, let’s look at how the protected class corruptly manipulates the system.
As you know by now, there are three cases of assault that have been documented against Ann Morgan Lilly and “Rut” Lilly. Except for the latest incident, that happened to involve a sitting mayor of El Paso, the documents to the other two incidents have been kept from the community by the City of El Paso. The documents have vanished into the blackhole of a “special investigations” police unit at the City.
I have described to you how the City keeps a police unit for special investigations, or very important people (VIPs). It is my contention that this special police unit has created two classes of citizens in El Paso, the protected class and the rest. Two sets of standards are enforced at the city.
In my eyes, corruption is proved when the City allows for two standards of law enforcement to exist. Yet, many still cannot bring themselves to believe it. So, let me add a little more detail, courtesy of the Lilly’s.
Unlike the previous two assault incidents that have been alleged, the latest one involves the sitting mayor of El Paso. As such, a dilemma was created in the scheme. Oscar Leeser, with the authority of the mayor’s office behind him, plus the fact that he is angry, has made it extremely difficult to control the information about the incident.
Add to that the fact that Ann Morgan Lilly is no longer useful to the corruptors of the city. She can no longer hold office and as such she cannot be placed to vote for the public policy of the corruptors.
As a result, it is my contention that the latest incident was allowed to be properly documented and the police report released to the community as it should have been.
This has put Ann Morgan Lilly in the predicament of having to use a favorite tool of the corruptors; intimidation and misdirection.
You will notice that a day after the incident entered the public realm and that it became clear to the Lilly’s that they were not as protected as they thought they were, they resorted to intimidation and are attempting to misdirect the public narrative by filing an ethics complaint against Oscar Leeser.
In her ethics complaint, Ann Morgan Lilly, alleges that Oscar Leeser abused his authority be summoning the police to the restaurant after the incident. You might notice, that it is preferred that the police be called whenever an incident happens so that it can be properly documented. The police and society prefer this over someone taking matters into their own hands. The other thing to keep in mind is that it was Lisa Leeser, the mayor’s wife, that filed the assault charge.
There are two things that Ann Morgan Lilly is hoping to accomplish through the filing of the ethics complaint. The first is that she is attempting to intimidate the mayor into silence, into walking away from the police complaint. The other thing she is trying to accomplish is to misdirect the narrative away from questions about her conduct, especially those that delve into her previous incidents. She is hoping that people focus on the ethics complaint instead of the police report that has entered the public realm. She is trying to create the illusion that she is a victim.
That is how corruption is perpetuated, first through keeping information hidden, then through intimidation and then through misdirection.
Do you see how it works?
Unfortunately, the whole corruption is much more insidious than that. Tomorrow, I’ll connect some more dots for you.