Site icon El Paso News

The Courts of Inquiry and El Paso Public Corruption

Advertisements

The following is a guest post by Judge Richard A. Roman

“When two elephants fight, it’s the grass that gets trampled” – African proverb.

El Paso suffers from a depressing self-image. There is plenty of blame to go around. How does rampant corruption occur in the presence of DA Jamie Esparza and former County Attorney Jose Rodriguez? EPISD is no stranger to longstanding allegations of corruption, county government as well. Do we blame a lazy, incompetent – or even worse – a complicit news media? Some say nothing will ever change, whistleblowers will always be punished.

The FBI finally had to get involved to spearhead a far-reaching, ongoing public corruption investigation. However, investigative courts of inquiry were present before all of this. Indeed, a strong argument can be made that their purpose was first tested right here in El Paso. The rest of Texas seems to have followed El Paso’s example. I was fortunate to have a ringside seat at one such inquiry  We must be mindful that in our community, the people are the “grass”. Our elected officials, law enforcement, the news media and anyone in a position of public trust are the “elephants”. So when elephants clash, like in in the public corruption scandal, “it’s the grass that gets trampled”.

Editor’s note: Judge Richard A. Roman is the former judge of the 346th District Court. Judge Roman signed the order convening the first of six Courts of Inquiry that looked into allegations of wrongdoing at the El Paso Police Department and the office of District Attorney Jaime Esparza.

Exit mobile version